By Tony
Deblauwe
Let me begin my review by saying I am a satisfied customer of Roto-Rooter. I
used their service once a long time ago and everything went smooth – the call,
the service crew, the timing, etc. These characteristics were well portrayed in
the UB episode.
I kept thinking – is he truly THAT disconnected from people in the rank and
file that take these jobs, or should he have investigated his personal issues
in more detail before agreeing to do this show?
I know for many people the human side of UB – no matter what form it takes – is
the heart and soul of program. The thinking is - it shouldn’t matter if the
leader walks away with things he can change for EVERYONE in the company versus
just the folks he meets undercover. I disagree completely in this case. In the
opening scene, Arquilla talks about the slow economy but mentions that
In the reveal, the “token gifts” element was all he had to offer:
-Investigating a bumbled disability claim
-Giving mortgage
assistance and paying for special needs care of a child
-Asking an
employee working through recovery to go speak to other employees
-A new van so the employee could better manage shuttling kids to basketball
practice
-A garage
so a few employees can restore muscle cars
So if I’m a Roto-Rooter employee who has any personal issue but wasn’t lucky
enough to have the President meet me undercover – what do I get? Can I make a
special trip to headquarters, meet Arquilla, get him to cry because of my
struggles, and walk away with cash or an off-road vehicle for my therapy?
Again – let me be clear – every single person in the show deserved the help and
I am happy they got it. This has nothing to do with the compassion imparted as
part of this experience. My gripe is that
UB is about improving the perception that leaders have grown disconnected from
their people. By going undercover you learn about your people sure, but you
also take away larger operational changes as a result of meeting with a few
high performing folks.
Joel
Manby of Herschend Family Entertainment did it right. He helped some
individual employees, but he largely got the takeaways he needed to foster
policy change. I hope that behind the scenes Roto-Rooter takes the same
approach as Herschend in understanding the profile of their folks and adopting
policies that help employees over the long run.





